As the summer solstice approaches, on June 21, its not too soon to start fretting about the earliest-ever Academy Awards ceremony, set for Feb. 9 of next year. Granted, the Oscars were handed out in seemingly earlier November of 1930, 1931 and 1932. But the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences qualified films on a fiscal year back then. So the gap between what used to be a July 31 close of eligibility and the late fall ceremony was well over three months, considerably more than the five or six weeks that will separate next years ceremony, the 92nd, from the seasons final releases.
The tight schedule has already made things feel a bit, well, accelerated. Almost two weeks ago, just after Memorial Day, the Academy named the recipients of its honorary Oscars—Geena Davis, David Lynch, Wes Studi and Lina Wertmuller—to be presented at a Governors Awards dinner on Oct. 27, four days before Halloween. Maybe a costume party is in order. And the in-box is starting to catch “save-the-date” notes for a film awards events that have to slip through tiny windows like the one between the end of the Toronto International Film Festival on Sept. 15 and the Emmy Awards on Sept. 22.
Pity the poor publicists. The compressed calendar sets up a mean promotional squeeze.
But theres more: The early Oscar date also promises to heighten the socio-political tensions that have marked virtually all recent awards shows, including last weeks ultra-low rated Tonys.
By a quirk of fate, next years earliest-ever Academy Awards date will align with a heavily front-loaded Presidential primary schedule. Oscar night comes six days behind the Iowa caucuses, on Feb. 3, and just two days before the New Hampshire primary, on Feb. 11. More portentously, Super-Tuesday, with 13 state primaries, is less than a month behind the Oscars, on March 3—and this year, California, with its massive electoral load, will join those early primary states.
Anyone who doesnt think dozens of sharp Democratic Read More – Source